Monday, April 2, 2012

Bridget Costello Elementary Week 10 step 7

1.       How do your proposed strategies (Week 8 Step 6) meet the required standards as your Week 6 Step 4 stated?
My goals were not completely aligned to the standards from my week 6. I found some that would match up better and in turn, allow me to better guide my goals and figure out how to steer my strategies to make them more beneficial to my district.
One of the proposed strategies was to have teachers be able to chose part of their training for the year. They would be asked to suggest certain trainings and the district would aim to allow for 50% of those suggestions to be put into the district's professional development plan. The standard that most closely matches this strategy is from the State Board for Education Certification Website (SBEC) standards. One standard states "Standard V. All teachers know how to plan, organize, deliver, and evaluate instruction for all students that incorporates the effective
use of current technology for teaching and integrating the Technology Applications Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills (TEKS) into the curriculum (2006-2020)." This will really guide the objective because it's purpose is for teachers to look for the most current technology and use it in the classroom. They need to evaluate these sources and see if they are effective in teaching and how could they use it in the classroom if it is. TEA states that “The Texas STaR Chart is designed to help campuses and districts gauge progress in meeting federal requirements for technology literate teachers, librarians, and administrators (2006-2020).”After a year of trying to implement this goal, the district can re-assess and decide if it was effective asking teachers to give suggestions. 
Another one of my strategies that could be redirected to be more efficient was the strategy for teachers to look for more ways to receive funding. The SBEC Standards state that "Standard II. All teachers identify task requirements, apply search strategies, and use current technology to efficiently acquire, analyze,
and evaluate a variety of electronic information
(2006-2020)." This again, gives teachers the means to look for these grants. The standard mentions to "apply search strategies." These strategies will lead teachers in the right direction to search for grants that are already created, and also ones that they could write themselves in order to receive funding for specific instructional strategies that they have in their individual classes. The HEF truly wants to help teachers get the things they need and bring innovative ideas into the classroom (Williams, 2012).


2.       Review the reading materials in Technology domain to propose using other standards which are not adopted by your studied school. Explain why those new standards should be considered for your studied school.

 One standard that I do not feel my school addresses enough from SBEC and states "Standard I. All teachers use technology-related terms, concepts, data input strategies, and ethical practices to make informed decisions about current technologies and their applications (2006-2020)." I feel that our school does not use enough of the terminology when working with our elementary students. I believe that the more they hear those key terms, the quicker it will stick and the more they will understand. If we use "kid friendly" language until they leave elementary, middle school will be a complete shock to them. However, if we use it from the start along with kid friendly language, there will not be as much of a change when they get older. They may not use all of the terms on their own, but they will at least have heard them and be familiar with what the terms mean. This, I believe will help student to be more adapt at technology at a younger age.
I know that in our district we have a program called SRA (McGraw-Hill 2010) that teaches students the technology standards through an interactive lesson program. We are required to do this program. It is self led by the student and they go at their own pace. It gives post tests to see if students can apply the knowledge that they learned and use it to correctly perform on the post tests. There is a large typing section which I think it great for them. However, since the computer does most of the talking, teachers do not have the opportunity to use the technology terms. The program does include many technology terms and does make the students do the lessons accurately before they can move on. However, I think teachers need to work more to get those same terms in their classroom learning. Not only the computer lab once a week time.


Bibliography

SBEC. (2006-2020). Retrieved April 1, 2012, from School Technology and Readiness A Teacher Tool for Planning and Self-Assessing aligned with the Long-Range Plan for Technology: http://starchart.epsilen.com/statistics.html
McGraw-Hill Education. (2010). Retrieved February 19, 2012, from SRA TechKnowledge: http://www.sratechknowledge.com/
Williams, S. (2012, April 1). HEF Representative from Stewart Elementary. (B. Costello, Interviewer)

10 Comments:

At April 2, 2012 at 7:12 PM , Blogger rpawlik2012 said...

I agree with teaching the students about the terms. In every subject area one of the main issues is that students do not understand terms of that subject area.

For, "Classroom Best Practices, Using vocabulary and Terms states, " Classroom Best Practices:
Teaching Vocabulary Terms and Phrases
“Vocabulary terms and phrases” is one of the major categories of instructional content in any subject-matter area. Research indicates that there is a strong, direct relationship among vocabulary and intelligence, the ability to understand new information, and a person’s level of income. Some studies indicate that vocabulary instruction is one of the most important instructional practices teachers can use in the classroom, especially with low-achieving students. Vocabulary instruction is important across all grade levels, but the most significant achievement gains occur with secondary students. Research findings indicate that teacher instruction of new words and phrases increases the chances that students will understand the words when they read them later. Teaching vocabulary also improves a student’s understanding of new material.

Marzano,R. J., Pickering, D.J., Pollock, J.E. (2005). Classroom Instruction that Works: Research- Based Strategies for Increasing Student Achievement. Upper Saddle, NJ. Pearson.

 
At April 3, 2012 at 10:20 AM , Blogger rcc015 said...

I see your district has the same technology issues that mine does. Teachers use of technology in their content areas. At my school many teacher still use paper or worksheets instead of using the computers available on campus. I am trying to help our teachers use technology more. What are your suggestions for getting them to use technology more?

 
At April 3, 2012 at 11:32 AM , Blogger Dr. Shannon's CSTE Courses said...

Thank you for providing the standard items into this post. Good job!

 
At April 3, 2012 at 3:13 PM , Blogger Robyn Allphin said...

After reading several other posts, I have seen that many school districts have not adopted the ISTE NETS standards, including my school district. Has your district implemented these standards? Why or why not? I believe these are important standards, especially for technology personnel, because "the TF/TL standards address unique objectives related to improving K–12 technology programs that other national technology standards do not" (Williamson & Redish, 2009).

Williamson, Jo; Redish, Traci (2009-02-01). ISTE's Technology Facilitation and Leadership Standards: What Every K-12 Leader Should Know and Be Able to Do (Kindle Locations 391-392). International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE). Kindle Edition.

 
At April 3, 2012 at 7:47 PM , Blogger Bridget said...

Rachel, I'm glad someone else agrees with me on the vocabulary. This is something that has recently come up in our meetings at school. This new test really focuses on using the vocabulary from the TEKS SE's and we need to stop "sugar coating" terms and using the real vocabulary. This may seem difficult at first but research has shown that struggling learners need to hear something an average of 100 times before they truly understand it. If everyone is giving the elementary form of these vocabulary words, they will never be able to understand it!

One suggestion I have for getting more teachers to use technology is give them simple to use programs that keep students engaged and are easy for teachers to implement. When things are so difficult, they tend to not want to waste the time in learning to implement them. I think that showing them how much more fun and interactive technology can be rather than boring old worksheets will make teachers believers on its own!

Our district has not adopted all of the standards but they do have some posted in our technology plan. I'm not sure why they do not have all of them but I know that they are working towards implementing more.

 
At April 4, 2012 at 6:01 PM , Blogger rpawlik2012 said...

Bridget:
I was asked today what type of staff development we need for next year. I said that we need to introduce to our teachers some different programs that will be easy for the teachers to use and fun for the students. I am going to work on this throughout the summer. I want to come up with a list for all the teachers.

I also noticed reading everything for the new testing and it all talks around vocabualry. I gave my students a project that will be a test grade. They will make an ABC book of the vocabuluary within their math book. They will have to give the word, definition, picture with a problem solved. They seem to be enjoying it.

 
At April 4, 2012 at 6:32 PM , Blogger Kayla Monschke said...

Bridget,
How long has your district been using data from the STaR chart? I teach at a charter school, and at first I thought that charter schools were exempt from the STaR chart since we had not been using it. This is not the case, however, according to the STaR chart website http://starchart.epsilen.com. We should have been using it all along.

Kayla

 
At April 4, 2012 at 6:42 PM , Blogger Norma Vazquez said...

I can relate to the lack of the use of the appropriate terminology. However, we have found that when using the appropriate terminology we are accused of using technical jargon and end up causing additional frustration to the end user. Other problems with using jardon include exclusion or giving the sensation that there is a hidden agenda (Caudle, et al., 1999).

Caudle, P., Courtney, K., Guyton, H., Keller, M., and Kind, C. (1999). Jargon. Retrieved on April 4, 2012 from the The University of North Carolina at Pembroke website at http://www.uncp.edu/home/canada/work/allam/1914-/language/jargon.htm

 
At April 9, 2012 at 6:00 PM , Blogger Bridget said...

Rachel I love the idea of the vocabulary project! If they can make that assignment their own and really put some effort into it, I think that is something they will remember for a long time to come! What a great idea!

I have only been with my district for 2 and a half years but the 2 whole years I have been with them they have used the STaR chart. I'm glad you found out you should have been using it! I feel that for the teachers who truly assess each year instead of just copying answers from the previous year, it is a great tool to see their technological growth! I hope it will help your campus as well Kayla!

Norma, I do TOTALLY agree because when I was sitting in the technology planning meeting I could SWEAR they were talking a different language! However, I think that the more simple phrases like task bar, tool bar, window, search bar, ect is something that students need to hear. However, the more advanced jargon that the higher level computer tech workers know is definitely something that would confuse people! (Me included! haha) Thank you for speaking simply to people like me! :)

 
At April 11, 2012 at 6:26 PM , Blogger Marlise said...

Bridget,

I am so glad that you talk about terms. I just had an evaluation and my principal was so amazed at the way I kept drilling the kids on terms that they should know. If students cannot remember or understand terms they will never connect concepts. The Star Chart is also very helpful if it is used correctly. This is a tool that should be used to make sure teachers are using the technology in the classroom effectively. It also can be used to develop and revise technology professional development plans.

Marlise

 

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home