Private School - Susan Bevier
Week 10 discussion questions:
1.
How do your proposed strategies (Week 8 Step 6) meet
the required standards as your Week 6 Step 4 stated?
2.
Review the reading materials in Technology
domain to propose using other standards which are not adopted by your
studied school. Explain why those new standards should be considered for your
studied school.
Rawson-Saunders School is a private school, and is
not required to satisfy requirements set by the federal or state
government. We are accredited by the
Southern Association of Colleges and Schools (SACS), which has joined with
other accrediting organizations under the AdvancED umbrella. We are also a member
of the National Association of Independent Schools (NAIS). Week 6, Step 4
included these standards. In writing Report II, I did supplement the required standards
that were listed in Week 6 Step 4 to include the National Educational
Technology Standards (NETS) Essential Conditions because NAIS has endorsed NETS
as the foundation of their standards.
The relevant SACS/AdvancED standards include:
Teaching and Learning:
3.11 Coordinates and
ensures ready access to instructional technology, information and media
services, and materials needed for effective instruction.
3.11 (a) Integration
of technology into the instructional program in all classrooms to meet the needs
of all learners
3.11 (b) Level of
expectations held for technological sophistication and comfort of adults at
school
Professional development and commitment to continuous
improvement:
5.3 Establishes and
implements a process to design, evaluate, and improve professional development
and ensures participation by all faculty and staff
7.5 Provides research-based professional development for
system and school personnel to help them achieve improvement goals
Financial:
5.5 Engages in long-range budgetary planning and annually
budgets sufficient resources to support its educational programs and to
implement its plans for improvement
Physical resources:
5.10 Provides
technology infrastructure and equipment that is up-to-date and sufficient to
accomplish the system’s goals
(AdvancED, 2007)
NAIS enumerates principles
for planning and managing the use of technology in private schools, which are
to be used by administrators, teachers, and technology personnel. The
principles are organized into the following categories:
1. Leadership: The
school administration will provide support in planning, implementation, and
evaluation of technology integration, and will provide adequate resources for
teachers and students.
2.
Teaching
and Learning: Teachers research,
evaluate, and employ technology to support the curriculum to meet learning
needs of the students, and use technology to transform learning through
creation of new learning opportunities.
3.
Professional
Development: Technology integration is recognized as a critical piece in
teachers’ professional development, and provides both sufficient time and
resources for implementation.
4.
Infrastructure
and Administrative Operations: The school has adequate technology resources and
technology staff to support efficient and effective administrative operations.
(National Association of Independent Schools, 2010)
ISTE NETS specifies a set of
essential conditions for effective integration of technology into learning:
1.
Shared
Vision: All stakeholders in the educational community share a vision of
technology in the school
2.
Empowered
Leaders: All stakeholders are empowered to effect change
3.
Implementation
Planning: A plan for technology integration is aligned with the shared vision
4.
Consistent
and Adequate Funding: Funding for technology resources and personnel, and staff
development is ongoing
5.
Equitable
Access: All students, teachers, and staff have reliable access to relevant
technology resources
6.
Skilled
Personnel: Faculty and staff possess skills in selection and use of technology
7.
Ongoing
Professional Learning: Educators have technology professional development and
time to practice and share with colleagues
8.
Technical
Support: Technology is maintained and personnel is available to answer
questions
9.
Curriculum
Framework: Digital-age learning exists within the curriculum content standards
and is aligned
10.
Student-Centered
Learning: All planning, teaching, and assessment is developed based on
students’ needs and abilities
11.
Assessment
and Evaluation: The use of technology is continually evaluated along with
teaching and learning
12.
Engaged
Communities: Support for integrated technology comes from partnerships and
collaboration with the community
13.
Support
policies: Technology resources are a part of the administration’s policies,
financial planning, accountability measures, and incentive programs
14.
Supportive
External Context: Technology integration is supported through policies and
incentives set at the national, regional, and local levels.
(ISTE, 2010)
My management objectives are:
Goal 1: The administration will support fair and
equitable access to technology to faculty, staff, and students so that they can
effectively and efficiently perform required tasks.
·
Objective 1.1: Technology staff will maintain a
current inventory of all technology resources
·
Objective 1.2: Technology staff will maintain a
list of technology needs
·
Objective 1.3: Administration will form a
technology committee consisting of representatives from the administration,
department representatives, and technology coordinator which will meet at least
once per semester to set technology direction of school, including maintaining
the campus technology plan and evaluating the use of technology to support
instruction.
Goal 2: The administration will support the
development of competencies in ISTE’s National Education Technology Standards
(NETS) for learning, teaching and leading.
·
Objective 2.1: Develop a list of staff and faculty
technology competencies which define expectations
·
Objective 2.2: Perform a yearly needs assessment
of staff and faculty technology skills.
·
Objective 2.3: To support all staff and faculty
meeting technology competencies, provide professional development through
workshops and mentoring that address needs.
·
Objective 2.4: Students demonstrate
developmentally-appropriate technology skills and knowledge as defined in
NETS-S; evidenced by accomplishment of
authentic tasks documented in school records, lesson plans, portfolios, and
observation.
·
Objective
2.5: Technology will be integrated into instruction will be as evidenced by
lesson plans, teacher and student portfolios, and observation.
Strategies for these objectives:
Procedures for the strategies are
partly included in the objectives, but are fleshed out here. I am assuming that
the administration is in agreement with the goals and objectives within this
plan.
1.
Create
an updated and complete inventory of all technology
2.
Perform
a needs assessment of technology needed for teaching, learning, and operations.
3.
Create
a document listing all technology needs.
4.
Form
a campus technology committee
5.
Technology
committee reviews, makes any necessary revisions, and endorses this technology
plan
6.
Technology
committee creates vision statement for technology on campus
7.
Technology
committee develops list of age-appropriate student technology competencies and
determine how they will be assessed
8.
Based
upon current research, NETS, and student technology competencies, technology
committee develops list of faculty and staff technology competencies
9.
Assess
current state of faculty and staff technology competency and comfort levels
10.
Create
a list of needs based on the target technology competencies and the current
state
11.
Prioritize
the list of needs
12.
Based
upon the stated technology direction, student competencies and subject
curricula, develop list of strategies for technology integration in the
classroom
13.
Identify
which, if any, of these strategies are currently implemented and by whom.
14.
Designate
these teachers as mentors who will work with Technology Coordinator to support expanded
technology integration on campus
15.
Revise
prioritized list of professional development needs if necessary
16.
Research
professional development options to address prioritized needs
17.
Identify
professional development costs, with identification of possibilities available
at no cost
18.
Schedule
professional development (if necessary, contract with provider)
19.
Referring
to student, faculty, and staff competencies, inventory list, and technology
integration strategies, prioritize technology purchases
20.
Create
list of specifications for technology purchases
21.
Review
technology funding options in school operating budget, fundraising, and grants.
Identify available funds.
22.
Obtain
bids on highest priority technology items
23.
Make
technology purchases as funds allow and install
24.
Technology
committee will periodically review and assess technology needs, professional
development needs, and state of technology integration and address areas of
concern
Because the ISTE Essential
Conditions are the most comprehensive, I will use them as the basis of this
alignment table:
ISTE’s Essential
Conditions
|
Objectives
(o) & Strategies (s)
|
AdvancED/SACS
standards
|
Shared vision
|
1.3(o); 6 (s)
|
---
|
Empowered leaders
|
1.3(o); 4-8 (S)
|
---
|
Implementation Planning
|
1.3(o); 12(s)
|
3.11(a)
|
Consistent and Adequate Funding
|
21, 24(s)
|
5.5
|
Equitable Access
|
Goal 1
|
5.10
|
Ongoing Professional Learning
|
2.3(o), 9-18, 24(s)
|
5.3 & 7.5
|
Technical Support
|
(in technology goals)
|
---
|
Curriculum Framework
|
2.5(o), 12(s)
|
---
|
Student-Centered Learning
|
7,8,12(s)
|
---
|
Assessment and Evaluation
|
24(s)
|
---
|
Engaged Communities
|
---
|
---
|
Support Policies
|
Goals 1&2
|
---
|
Supportive External Content
|
2.4(o), 8(s)
|
---
|
As evidenced by this chart, the objectives and strategies are fully aligned with ISTE’s Essential Conditions except for one element, developing partnerships in the community to support technology. The objectives and strategies are fully aligned are fully aligned with the AdvancED/SACS standards.
In considering other standards not adopted by my
school, I examined the National Education Technology Plan (NETP). This plan is
based on the recognition that “technology is at the core of virtually every
aspect of our daily lives and work, and we must leverage it to provide engaging
and powerful learning experiences and content, as well as resources and
assessments that measure student achievement in more complete, authentic, and
meaningful ways.” The plan identifies five key areas: learning, assessment,
teaching, infrastructure, and productivity (U.S. Department of Education, 2010).
My school should consider each of these areas as described in this plan.
·
Learning: The NETP states that we should look to
creating an engaging, relevant, and personalized education for all students
that mirrors their technology-filled world and the future. At the core of this
approach is the student taking responsibility for his or her own learning. I
would note that an extension of this is that teachers take model this learning
style as well, and take responsibility for their professional development in
technology. Teachers should not step back and claim they cannot use technology
because no professional development is in place. I do hear this in my school,
and it is an attitude that needs to change.
·
Assessment: Standards and assessments must
include 21st century competencies and expertise across the
curriculum. Using cognitive research and theory about how students think in an
interactive, media-rich environment, technology-based formative assessments can
be used to make needed modifications in teaching as well as determine what
students have learned for grading purposes, using data to drive continuous
improvement. My school has not taken advantage of technology-based assessments.
·
Teaching: Use a connected teaching model, where
teachers have the tools to incorporate content and resources to create, manage,
and assess learning experiences that engage students. Teachers at my school
have begun to explore this model, but have lacked to technology in the
classroom to fully implement.
·
Infrastructure: The infrastructure must be in
place in our schools to support the learning, teaching, and assessments
described above. While my school is fully networked, support for mobile devices
such as iPads is lacking.
·
Productivity: As in all parts of society,
improved productivity is essential in education. Among the areas in which
productivity can be improved: measuring educational progress in terms of “seat
time,” groupings by age, teaching academic disciplines as individual entities,
and pacing of instruction. My school relies on these traditional structures,
but should be open to exploring new designs in education.
Resources
AdvancED. (2007). AdvancED Accreditation Standards for Quality
School Systems. http://www.broward.k12.fl.us/k12programs/District_Accreditation/pdf/advanced_district_standards.pdf
International Society for
Technology in Education. (2009). Essential
conditions. Retrieved March 24, 2012, from http://www.iste.org/standards/nets-for-students.aspx
National Association of
Independent Schools. (2010). Technology
use in private schools. Retrieved February 22, 2012, from http://www.nais.org/about/seriesdoc.cfm?ItemNumber=149157&sn.ItemNumber=146810
U.S. Department of Education.
(2010). National Education Technology
Plan. Retrieved January 18, 2012, from http://www.ed.gov/technology/netp-2010
6 Comments:
Susan,
Your posting is very comprehensive. Good job. Thank you for the NETS Essential Conditions. I had not discovered those previously. I think they correlate well with the NAIS PGPGs.I think you and I are coming to similar conclusions: that while some steps may be needed to improve the technology infrastructure, the larger impediment is with advancing the teaching and learning practices among the faculty. For this to improve, the technology needs to be made available, but more importantly, the teachers must be influenced to change their practices to make effective use of the technology in their instruction. This is a tough hurdle.
Mike, Thanks for your input. I, too, was glad to find the Essential Conditions. As the name implies, they are the foundation for implementing the NETS for students and teachers.
Yes, we do have a challenge to change the mindset of our teachers. In my case, teachers do use many of the universal design methods of instruction, so they are not tied to textbooks or other specific learning materials. They do, however, need to explore how technology can be another tool to support their instructional goals. I can help and support this effort, and I have to some degree, but we aren’t fully there yet. (One recent success: a teacher who rarely uses technology had his students do a paperslide video to organize and reflect upon learning. I had thought paperslides would be a fit for him. It was the sort of quirky approach to tech integration that he found appealing. Like being aware of a student’s learning style, we often must find ways to bring technology into the classroom that is compatible with a teacher’s instructional style.)
Susan,
Appreciated your blog. Very comprehensive and easy to read. Thank you for the insight, I too work for a private school but did not know that so many resources were available for those in our position.
Thanks again :)
I agree with you Mike in that changing the teachers' perspective is a large hurdle. This is one of the technology facilitator's hardest challenge in being able to reshape a "teachers' long-standing beliefs about teaching and learning" (Williamson & Redish. (2009). However, with proper training and guidance from the facilitator to present the information in a meaningful manner should help change these beliefs.
Williamson, J. & Redish, T. (2009). ITSE's Technology Facilitation and Leadership Standards: What Every K-12 Leader Should Know and Be Able to Do. Washington, D.C. International Society for Technology in Education (ITSE).
Amy, For those of us in private schools, it does seem that most resources target the public schools. a benefit of this program is that we have been able to make connections with others in our situation.
Norma,
In addition to the training and guidance from the facilitator, the support from the administration is critical. As administration sets technology as one of the priorities of the school, teachers are more likely to make the effort to increase the use of technology.
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home